Đặng Chí Hùng unmasks himself
In an article by “steel pen/
steellike author” Đặng Chí Hùng, “Garma or Việt Nam” (sic), which was
broadcast (on air) in the internet forums on March 18, 2017, if
one notices, he/ she will recognize immediately that in his article consisted
of only 5 words “Garma or Việt Nam” Đặng Chí Hùng already disclosed his
real political identity and partially revealed his position of opposing Vietnam
(non-Vietnam position).
It is impossible to separate
Garma from Việt Nam. That was the thought of Vietnamese
communists since Hố Chí Minh’s
era when he was still alive and in power. Therefore, he, through Prime Minister Phạm Văn Đồng, wrote up a departmental
decree to publicly
give out Hoàng Sa and Trường Sa (Spratly archipelago) to Communist China. This
decision by Ho was executed because at that time Việt Nam was no longer
the fatherland of the
People of Việt Nam, but it was a satellite colony of USSR /Russia and China.
Its name was Vietnamese Democratic Republic, the first step to become “the Socialist
Republic of Việt Nam”, as it currently is.
In his beginning statements,
Hùng demonstrates himself as “the mute who loves to talk” as our ancestors’
popular saying puts it.
In the following, the author
would like to share with you some details so we will share it together and understand
the real content of Đặng Chí Hùng’s article. It will show
either he stands by the People of Vietnam or he stands by the political whistle
blower Nguyễn Văn Lý, who worships both Vietnamese communists and aggresively
invading China.
The evident is proven
by the content of his political call as well as his instruction to the
protesters to “wear white shirts” to fight the invading Chinese forces.
Note 1: Đặng Chí Hùng has
affirmed his viewpoints as follows:
“In term of the people’s logic
then we should not need to commemorate the communist soldiers whose theme was “Be loyal to the
Party”. These soldiers only and always have obeyed the Party’s orders and
finally those soldiers already have offered their hands to push our
country to the destrution as it is currently is” (sic)
In this paragraph, Đặng Chí
Hùng has confirmed the Communist soldiers always “Be loyal to the
Party” as their top priority.
In reading his article carefully
one will immediately understand that Đặng Chí Hùng has begun to cover up and support and/ or skillfully help out the communist authorities in which these communist soldiers
were forced by the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV) to be absolutely loyal to it.
Therefore, only because these soldiers obey to the CPV’s orders so they got caught in middle while committing their crimes “Already contributed their efforts to push
our country Việt Nam to the brink of destruction as it is now...(sic)
That is Dang Chi Hung’s logic.
Note 2: Đặng Chí Hùng
continued with his writing:
“But if analyzing it under a sentimental scope then these
people are Vietnamese, who are also victims of the CPV. Therefore, if we can spare time and
organize memorial service to commemorate them then that is also a good
humanistic gesture. We are totally different from the Communists in which we do not
revenge dead people, especially those people who were victims rather than
criminals” (sic).
It means Đặng Chí Hùng has
affirmed communist soldiers are “also victims of the CPV” (sic). Therefore,
he calls on “If we have time to organize memorial services to commemorate them then
that is also a humanistic gesture” (sic)
Đặng Chí Hùng, let me ask
you one question: The aggressively invading Chinese through their
bloody history from the dynastic kingdoms to the communist
administrations, there were many armed forces commanders
who were ordered by their top political leaders to invade Vietnam. Then, can you
differentiate between the willing/ intentional commanders and the unwilling/
unintentional commanders? Also, can you differentiate between the
Chinese invaders who invaded Việt Nam but did not commit capital crimes such
as robbing, raping Vietnamese women and children? It is also similar
to Vietnam through television shows or stories
recited by parents or other low quality TV or radio programs? Have you been aware of the victims of
the Communists then you confirmed that “Finally, it is them, but the communist
armed forces, have contributed their efforts to push Vietnam into national genocides (sic). However, you emotionally call on
people to organize memorial services/ commemorative ceremonies to the communist
armed forces and also disrespectfully consider your ambiguous proposals as
“humanistic” in order to push a green light to the questionable political
parties inside and outside Vietnam to implement your suggestion.
Vietnamese ancestors’ teaching:” Don’t fight fallen
guys (from horses)”, and also consider the deaths as “Kindness
to dead people tenders him/ her last fine farewell”.
That’s why Vietnamese ancestors used to provide invading surrendered
soldiers with food, horses and boats… so they could safely return home. But to
some Chinese invading commanders our ancestors had to find all means to kill
them to prevent future political/ military danger. Ex: Drilling off fighting
boats to drown Chinese General Ô Mã Nhi of the Nguyên Dynasty.
These are ancient stories in
Vietnam and they were very good illustrations to you, Đặng Chí Hùng.
To the whole world, let me ask
you:
1/ Why the French people sentenced
to death French General Petain whom he once was highly decorated as a hero of France. And since
the end of the World War Two until
now, have you ever seen any French individuals or any organizations that organize memorial service for Petain?
2/ German people treats Hitler similarly. Have you been aware German
people organizing memorial service for Hitler? Even though Hitler was not a
national traitor as French General Petain.
I would like to recite the two above examples so you can well remember and your arrogant head may
be absorbed with updated information. In referencing to many additional sources
of information then my concern is that your originally skewed off brain which probably
lacks of sense of righteousness so it cannot remember and digest all
those lessons of history.
Note 3: You continued to assert:
“But why do we have to support memorial service to the soldiers of the
Republic of Vietnam Armed Forces who sacrificed in the sea battle at Hoang Sa island in South Vietnam in 1974 at this current time? This incident is quite different from Garma incident. The soldiers
of the Armed Forces of the Republic of Vietnam no longer had their father land, they bravely fought and did
not surrender to Chinese enemies. They are deserved to be honored and we
memorize them in order to ignite the spirit of not standing still to become human-flesh targets for Chinese to train their soldiers. Hoang Sa’s memorial
service is quite different from Garma incident at that point” (sic)
In this paragraph, your unpatriotic political viewpoint has been again clearly disclosed.
You have self-nominated as “a steel pen/ steellike author”, so let me ask you if you can understand
my two following questions:
a/ First question: “Those soldiers of the Republic of Vietnam who had no
father land, did not surrender to invading China. They deserve to be decorated
(sic).
This short paragraph of yours contains hiding untruthfulness.
First, the Hoang Sa sea battle which happened was not because “the soldiers of
the Republic of Vietnam” did not have their father land. In 1974, the Republic of Vietnam
was a legitimate, legal, constitutional government which was legally recognized
by hundreds of elected
governments
around the world. Surely,
I can
wear my Vietnamese wooden pair of clogs to walk inside your stubborn head to fully understand that you
purposefully wrote that statement to fool people that “the ARVN bravely fought
and did not surrender to
Chinese naval force (sic) because the ARVN no longer had the father land at that time therefore their brave fighting
at that time was only because they got trapped in the dead end with no points to
return or evade so they were forced to fight back China without another
options, and those fights were not the nature of heroism of the ARVN.
Please be reminded that at that time, only the
ARVN mainly assumed the combatting role, especially on the ground battlefields, to protect Vietnamese fatherland and to
fight off all invading forces.
b/ Đặng Chí
Hùng, do you think nobody can identify your real identity? If author Vũ Tài
Lục had been still alive, then he would have been
able to look at your puffy and oily face to
perform his highly professional assessment of your human face,
body and your overall composure. Then, he immediately determine
who you are, what you are doing and how you can lie too much
and too deep about the Armed Forces of the Republic of
Vietnam (ARVN) via your very good skill of
manipulating words. You also have degraded the heroic sacrifice of the ARVN down to
the level of “humanistic level/ aspect” in order to tactfully
commenmorate the armed forces
of the Communist Party of Vietnam (CPV)?
If you are really a patriot to
our being-destructed fatherland Vietnam and is really a “steel pen/
steellike author” to appreciate
the
greatest, immeasurable sacrifice of the Armed Forces of Vietnam (ARVN) then every single Vietnamese person, regardless of ages, genders and
where they are currently living now, at any corner of the globe, who are
non-Communist, anti-Communist, and has a fair and self-respected conscience
then all these Vietnamese people have to decorate all members of the ARVN,
regardless of their ranks in their heroic, structured and disciplined
organization (The Armed Forces of Republic of Vietnam) who used to fight
heroically to defend their beloved country and protect Vietnamese people. This
thought is quite opposite and may be contrary to your thinking/ writing style
“Deserve to be decorated” as you heartlessly put down your extremely dull pen
to write it on your highly stained pieces of worthless papers.
c/ Đặng Chí Hùng again unmasked himself when he wrote:”The soldiers of the Republic of Vietnam no longer have had their fatherland (sic).
c/ Đặng Chí Hùng again unmasked himself when he wrote:”The soldiers of the Republic of Vietnam no longer have had their fatherland (sic).
So the author asks you:
- Do the communist soldiers have
their fatherland?
- If you affirmed the “soldiers
of the Republic of Vietnam no longer had their fatherland, then why you have to
borrow the heritage yellow flag of the Republic of Vietnam and the image of the
Republic soldiers to mask your face of a hired hand to work for Nguyen
Van Ly and Ngo Thanh Hai?
- It is quite correct as you
admitted yourself:” The author, Dang Chi Hung, is only an average person,
having no talents (sic)
It is quite correct that you are not deserved as “an average person” but
only a guy who was born to “play horses” so others can ride on your
back. Therefore, how can you have talents because a horse that is wearing
eye-blindfold can only run towards one single direction at a time under its
owner’s orders?
It is to inform you that the CPV, even if they possess, confiscate and is
managing the land of the nation of our father land Vietnam, yet they have to be
so scared to witness that our fatherland of the armed forces of the Republic of
Vietnam has been building up and standing up steadfastly. Before 4/30/1975, the
Communists called the soldiers and the People of South Vietnam as “fake
people”. After 4/30/1975, the grand traitor Phạm Văn Đồng once stood publicly in Paris
to call the Republic soldiers and People “Hookers, thieves, lazy bumps, seekers
of left-over butter and milk…”. But then after a while those Communists had to
tone down and call those people as “Our extended intestines”. They also praised that
“Overseas Vietnamese are intellectuals and vaults of U.S. dollars”.
Recently, they promoted these “bumps
“ to a level higher “Diplomatic and economic bridges” to other countries.
“ to a level higher “Diplomatic and economic bridges” to other countries.
It is clearest that, in term of their
official documents, they
issued their so-called “36th
Congressional Resolution”. In term of organization, they created the so-called
“Central Committee of Overseas
Vietnamese ”. Then they
raised it up to Committee of Overseas Vietnamese” and now they created the so-called
“Communist
Committee of Overseas
Vietnamese”.
And now, it is still rare incidents, but some
heritage yellow national flag of the Republic, have flown high in the protests
run by justice-seeking
proletariats. Furthermore, in the disputes of the ownership of Hoang Sa and
Truong Sa/ Spratly archipelago the CPV had to face down on the ground to remind
people the sacrifice of Captain Lieutenant Colonel Nguy Van Tha and his
sailors, a navy branch of the armed forces of the Republic of Vietnam, have truly shed their blood to fight Chinese
enemies in defending their
country exactly as
their ancestors did it centuries ago. They
did not stand still to bear the fates of human targets or hunting animals for
aggressive Chinese invaders in order to entertain the Vietnamese communists in Garma.
Because you are a blindfolded horse which
cannot see through and understand those
incidents so you only deserve to be a horse so people can ride on your back. It
is regrettable that you have a human face but your brain has been fully dead
and/ malfunctioned,
therefore, you cannot recognize the Vietnamese heroes but you are only able to see some horses’ hairs, some whistle blowers for the CPV such as Nguyen Van Ly, Ngo Thanh Hai
and Dieu Cay Nguyen Van Hai…
Note 4: Dang Chi Hung, on your
black-and-white paper you wrote:
“Even though there are some political
points that need to be
discussed thoroughly about our global protest (against the CPV), but priest
Nguyen Van Ly’s call on is fully legitimate and offers a good opportunity to
save Vietnam from the dark days in future (sic) and you guarantee that “I, personally, believe that we all should extend our hands to support Father Nguyen Van
Ly and
this is a must-do thing (sic)
What is the real reason why you are so
enthusiastic with the whistle blower Nguyen Van Ly?
I already said I have ability to wear my
wooden pair of clogs to walk inside your dark brain and portray to
everybody that your twisted political
mind cannot fool anybody.
The CPV uses the whistle blower Nguyen Van Ly
in the scam of “Wearing white shirts” to protest peacefully, even wearing a small
cloth strip on the neck or around the wrist along with wearing white shirts to help
communist mobile police to easily identify those people, more or less, who want
to overthrow the CPV and its brutal governing machinery.
This cheap dirty trick was once employed by the combating writer Vu Thu
Hien to “destroy” writer Nguyen Thai Hoang who had launched
excellent reports about the justice-seeking proletariats (dân oan). The
CPV used Nguyễn Khắc Toàn to lead, maneuver and destroy the club of seekingg-justice proletariats. Then they
created a fake organization led by Nguyễn Khắc Toàn and several transformed
proletariats such as Lê Thị Kim Thu. She has become “permanent reporter” in the Socialist Republic
of Vietnam of Đinh Thạch Bích and Tường Thắng (Vietnam Exodus). By associating with Thu was moved to America and
she has been now a reporter working for both
Vietnam Exodus and Dân Làm Báo.
If those victims of the CPV who are not alert and
send materials to Đặng Chí Hùng, “the small refrigerator” of the Alliance of People then they should go ahead sending those materials to the Chief Tô Lâm in order to be given a “one-way trip” with no return. It is
faster than sending it to Đặng Chí Hùng.
Conclusion
Please be kindly reminded that both Nguyễn Văn Lý and Đặng Chí Hùng are the pair of parallel
horses who are carrying an extra big coffin to transport
people who listen to the direction of this political opportunist twin. They are leading naïve people to the development of the “36th Congressional
Resolution” to match up with the newly changing
political environment inside and outside Vietnam.
Chính Khí Việt
March 22, 2017
0 comments:
Post a Comment